Open letter to Gen Z

My dear Gen Z,

I am indebted to you, today. What you have done has no parallels to what my generation, the Gen X, has ever achieved. You have ignited the soul of India, the world’s oldest and largest democracy. You have awakened a nation, long in slumber. You have consecrated the conscience of our country, defiled with blind faith, greed and selfishness.

So, thank you.

While you have been at the receiving end, I witnessed the beginning of this age when it all started, when this evil began to first breathe and held our nation bewitched for so long. Ah! I was of your age then.

Our nation painstakingly built what our constitution stands for. Democracy, secularism, and individual rights, of these ideals our land was a crucible from time immemorial. Think of Vedanta, of Tripitakas, and many philosophical/spiritual traditions of the ‘argumentative Indians’ fame. We produced inexhaustible, comprehensive and intricate thoughts on polity, social mores and personal liberation. Yet, I saw it all dismantled. I witnessed these magnificent edifices crumble one by one when the thicket of ignorance, blinding faith and gluttony began to set in on 1.8 billion.

My generation, Gen X, was stupefied when glitters of ‘development’ shone on our eyes. We stood dazed for decades, gagged with irrationality. Many of us are in torpor of complacency still. And, here you are, my dear Gen Z, taking on the mantle for us and our children.

So, thank you.

Finally, as your elder brother, I have this to say. It is not about the evil pawns, but the current that generated their motley cohort. Believe me, most of them are riding the wave. As soon as it turns, so shall many decamp. You see, it is inherent to cowards, opportunists and the compromised.

My dear Gen Z. You rave. You make merry of your youth. You explore. All the yardsticks of yesteryears have rotten. You be the rebel who dictates your own terms. You dissent, resist and invent. You be Gen Z.

And, for taking on the baton that laid forsaken for so long. Thank you, once again.

Your brother in gratitude,

Lhundup Gyalpo

Lhundup Gyalpo is the author of Bettys Butter Tea – Stories from Ladakh.

Blind urbanisation and the issue of drug addiction

There is a lot of focus on drug addiction in Ladakh these days. Government agencies and NGOs are working hard to address it. Factors such as toxic family environment, poor parenting, peer pressure, and curiosity are often cited as causes. However, on deeper examination these are just the tip of the iceberg. The real causes lie much deeper in Ladakh’s ongoing social and economic transformation.

Ladakh’s traditional agrarian economy, once the backbone of its self-sustaining and close-knit society, has been rapidly crumbling as we shift to a tourism-driven economy. This has triggered widespread ‘blind urbanisation’ marked by large-scale migration from rural to urban centres in search of employment and educational opportunities.

This satellite image of a part of Leh town illustrates unplanned urbanisation taking place in Ladakh (Image: Google Earth)

One glaring impact of the ‘blind urbanisation’ is a sharp class divide. Ladakh has moved from its communitarian culture to a competitive, individualistic, and increasingly materialistic rat race mentality. Relationships are becoming hollow with marriages being based on social status and wealth rather than compatibility and shared values.

The rapidly fading agrarian lifestyle is sustained largely by the elders in rural areas. They continue agro-pastoral practices not for profit but due to their deep attachment to it. The youth, however, are in a quandary. Agriculture is neither economically attractive nor practically feasible. After completing their education, many youth remain without stable employment, income, or a clear sense of direction. This lack of substantive career prospects has led to disillusionment among the youth. They are struggling to pull through in an increasingly urbanised and competitive environment. This reminds me of German philosopher Nietzsche’s quote, “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. For when you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks also into you.” For frustrated youth, the abyss is gazing back. The disillusioned youth do not dare to guide the younger generation (Gen-Z).

The vulnerable youth of Gen-Z see a bleak future. They have grown up in a society where agriculture and self-sufficiency are no longer viable. Money is the only measure of success for many of these youth. When they don’t see legitimate and sustainable ways to achieve economic security, they feel frustrated and hopeless. Thus, many marginalised youth become disillusioned even before completing their schooling as they feel alienated from traditional values and modern opportunities. In this sense, that they are the first major victims of Ladakh’s ‘blind urbanisation.’ Other factors may trigger drug abuse but they are symptoms of deeper structural problems.

Unless we understand the larger picture, the situation is likely to deteriorate further. What we are witnessing today is merely the trailer rather than the full movie. Urgent efforts are required to strengthen educational institutions, sports facilities, and recreational centres in villages. Sustainable employment opportunities must be created in rural areas to enable youth to earn a livelihood while remaining connected to their families and communities. The benefits of tourism should not remain concentrated in Leh, Pangong-tso, Hunder, and Turtuk. It must be distributed more equitably across Ladakh with active support from the UT administration. The active promotion of homestays and community-based tourism in unexplored rural areas will spread economic opportunities and reduce migration pressures.

The UT administration’s experiment with ‘model schools’ has started producing encouraging results in a relatively short period. This needs to be expanded to create high quality schools in far-flung areas and enable students to access better educational opportunities without migrating. The recently established drug de-addiction centres and the Anti-Narcotics Task Force to combat the growing drug menace are commendable steps. However, all stakeholders must understand the deeper social, economic, and cultural dimensions to address this issue. Only a holistic approach that combines rural development, employment generation, educational reform, cultural preservation, mental health support, and community engagement can hope to tackle the root causes of addiction and safeguard Ladakh’s future.

By Stanzin Stamdin

Stanzin Stamdin is Assistant Professor at Government Degree College, Khaltse.

Kargil at crossroads: Unplanned urban growth and a fragile future

Historically, Kargil (Purig) was known for its simplicity, resilience, and close-knit community. Over time, this high altitude Trans Himalayan region grew within strict ecological limits marked by harsh climatic conditions, limited resources, and an agrarian economy. Population growth was gradual and livelihoods were localised. A delicate balance was maintained between nature and society. Nowadays, Kargil is experiencing a transformation. In recent years, it has witnessed rapid population growth and urban expansion. Recent administrative changes have improved some infrastructure, especially bridges and buildings, though the transition has taken place without scientific planning.

One of the most visible and pressing transformation is unchecked construction across the town. Buildings are constructed on fragile slopes and small plateaus that are vulnerable due to climate change. Many structures are being built along riverbanks and in congested areas. This is often being done without adherence to building norms. As a result, increased density and overcrowding has intensified while parking and resting spaces continue to shrink. Many of these sites are historically prone to avalanches, landslides and flooding, which makes the town’s layout unsafe and poorly organised.

Buildings constructed on fragile slopes in Kargil town. Photograph by Dr Fayaz Hussain

At the same time, basic civic infrastructure especially roads are struggling to cope with growing demand and urban in-migration. There is growing water scarcity, inadequate or absent sewerage systems, and inefficient waste management. Electrical infrastructure remains unreliable and often unsafe. Public utilities that were designed for a much smaller population are now under immense pressure.

The seriousness of this issues was highlighted by recent remarks by the Hon’ble Lieutenant Governor of Ladakh, Vinai Kumar Saxena during his visit to Kargil. While inspecting the main market area, he stressed on the urgent need for major changes in the town’s urban management and infrastructure. He observed that the present condition of the market was not satisfactory and pointed to challenges of congestion, poor planning, and lack of parking in the market. He also emphasised the need to clean and restore Suru river, which flows through the town and faces many problems such as pollution due to unregulated waste disposal, washing of clothes and cars, and urban expansion.

Traffic congestion has also become a serious issue in Kargil town, especially near schools, markets, and administrative centres. The concentration of institutions combined with a sharp rise in private vehicles and school buses has created chronic bottlenecks that undermine mobility and public safety. Despite its rapid urban growth, Kargil’s economic base remains weak and fragile. Local production is minimal, and it continues to depend on goods and services sourced from outside. This has created a growing imbalance where population growth exceeds economic capacity, making development increasingly unsustainable.

The core issue remains Kargil’s ecological fragility. It is located in a high altitude and ecologically sensitive zone and is vulnerable to environmental disturbances. Even small disruptions can trigger soil erosion and water depletion while increasing disaster risks. In such a landscape, unplanned urbanisation is not just a developmental challenge but also a question of long-term survival and sustainability.

This needs political urgency. Policymakers must recognise the seriousness of the situation and act decisively. It requires incorporation of traditional ways of life, scientific urban planning, strict enforcement of building regulations, zoning, sustainable water and waste management systems and expansion of town in safer zones. It requires improved traffic planning, decentralisation of institutions, and stronger urban governance mechanisms. Area based commercial planning model will be help urban management by reducing congestion and organising the market.

At the same time, the responsibility for sustainable development cannot rest solely on the government. Local citizens must play an active role by following building norms, reducing environmental damage, responsible citizen and supporting sustainable practices, and cooperating with planning efforts. Kargil is at crossroads. The path it chooses now will determine if it emerges as a model of sustainable mountain development or becomes a victim of unchecked urban chaos. The time to act is now; before today’s challenges become tomorrow’s irreversible problem.

By Dr Fayaz Hussain

Dr Fayaz Hussain is Assistant Professor of History at Government Degree College, Kargil’s Sankoo Campus.

(Top photograph of Kargil town by Mohd Hussain)

Why Kargil’s tourism needs empathy not obstacles

For decades after Ladakh opened for tourism in 1974, Kargil remained an afterthought: A place to halt for a night on the way to Leh or Srinagar. That reality is finally beginning to shift. The apricot blossom season, amplified by the reach of social media, has become a turning point. For the first time, travellers are not just passing through and are choosing to stay for several nights.

What is striking is not just the increase in footfall but also the effort that travellersare willing to make. Despite expensive flights, unpredictable weather, and complicated travel routes through Srinagar, Delhi, and Leh, visitors are determined to reach Kargil to witness the valleys in bloom. That level of intent is rare. It signals something important: Kargil is no longer a stopover. It is a destination.

This enthusiasm among tourists is doing more than just generating business for hoteliers and tour operators. It is creating a profound mind-set shift. Homestay owners, guides, and small local entrepreneurs, many of whom once saw limited opportunity in tourism, are beginning to recognise its potential. This psychological shift may be the most valuable outcome of all. And yet, just as Kargil is starting to find its footing, we are at risk of holding ourselves back.

 

Suru valley in Kargil (Photograph by Roots Ladakh)

Bureaucratic bottleneck

Traveling to Ladakh is already an expensive and logistically challenging endeavour. The last thing visitors should encounter on arrival is confusion and obstruction. Let’s be clear: Security protocols are necessary. Ladakh is a sensitive border region, and safety is non-negotiable. But there is a fundamental difference between ensuring security and creating friction.

At present, tourists and operators face a system defined by inconsistency. Rules are often unclear, undocumented, or communicated informally. Enforcement varies from one checkpoint to another. What is allowed one day is questioned the next. The consequences are not theoretical, they are happening on the ground.

Recently a group that had come to Kargil to witness the apricot blossom included a guest from Mauritius who held a valid Indian employment visa. She was abruptly denied a permit to visit the Dardic region along the lower Indus. The reason given was a year-old rule that was never officially notified nor communicated to local operators. The result was embarrassment, logistical disruption and an avoidable loss of experience for the guest.

In another instance, American tourists returning from a four-night Himalayan brown bear expedition in Drass were stopped at the Khaltse check post and asked to produce a permit for travel along a national highway. This is something unheard of in my 12 years in the industry. They were halted for three and a half hours until someone pulled strings with senior police officials to finally let them continue.

Adventure tourism faces similar uncertainty. The likes of Nun and Kun expeditions, the Warwan valley trek, and the Kalapari lake trek are gaining immense popularity, yet permit protocols remain opaque. Operators are left guessing requirements based on nationality, often leading to arbitrary last-minute denials and damage to one’s reputation. When operators have to rely on personal connections to rescue guests from arbitrary detentions or sudden permit rejections, the system is fundamentally broken. This is not just a logistical problem. It is a perception problem. For many visitors, these interactions form their first impression of the region. And in tourism, perception is everything.

 Opague rules have undermined Kargil’s rich potential for nature-based tourism

Bridging faith and cultural heritage

Alongside administrative challenges, there is a more nuanced, internal conversation that Kargil must confront. Our region possesses a multi-layered cultural history, but there remains hesitation in fully embracing and presenting it. Concerns rooted in conservative interpretations of faith often lead to an underrepresentation of our broader heritage.

This is a false dilemma. As a practicing Muslim and a local, I firmly believe that religion and cultural tourism do not have to be mutually exclusive. In fact, they can coexist beautifully and in many places, they already do.

From Malaysia and Indonesia to Iran and the Central Asian republics, societies have successfully preserved their religious identity while showcasing their historical and cultural diversity. Even regions culturally closer to home such as Gilgit-Baltistan have demonstrated that heritage can be presented with dignity, without compromising belief.

There is no reason why we cannot achieve the same harmony in Kargil. By viewing our cultural heritage not as a threat to our beliefs, but as a celebrated community asset, we open the door to a much richer, more sustainable model of tourism.

The path forward

Kargil has incredible potential. Between the apricot blossoms, brown bear expeditions, world-class trekking and mountaineering, and our diverse cultural roots, we have all the ingredients of a premier destination. But to harness this potential sustainably, more than promotion and infrastructure, Kargil’s tourism needs empathy from its stakeholders.

At the administrative level, there needs to be a shift in approach from control to facilitation, supported by transparent and publicly accessible guidelines on permits and travel protocols. This must be matched by consistent enforcement and better coordination across departments to eliminate contradictions and arbitrary decision-making. It is equally important to sensitise frontline officials to engage with visitors as welcomed guests, rather than treating them as an administrative burden. At the same time, we as a community must take ownership of our narrative; not just by embracing our cultural identity with confidence but doing this in a way that is open, inclusive, and welcoming. Empathy for tourism begins with how we present ourselves, and by sharing our heritage with pride rather than hesitation. This way, we create deeper and more meaningful experiences that allow travellers to truly connect with Kargil. We have finally convinced travellers to stay back and explore Kargil. Now, we must ensure our systems and mind-sets are ready to welcome them.

By Muzammil Hussain

Muzammil Hussain is Co-Founder of Roots Ladakh.

New districts, old tricks: Ladakh deserves better than administrative theatre

On 27 April, 2026, the Hon’ble Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena approved the creation of five new districts in Ladakh: Nubra, Sham, Changthang, Zanskar and Drass. This takes the total number of districts in Ladakh from two to seven. The administration called it historic. However, it is not historic. It is a pattern. And the people of Ladakh, who have seen it before, deserve to say so plainly.

In 2019, when Ladakh was designated a Union Territory, it was initially welcomed in Leh as a fulfilment of a long-pending demand for separation from J&K. The initial satisfaction was soon replaced by the realisation that UT without legislature meant that the local population had lost democratic representation and authority over their own affairs. What was described as liberation was a transfer of authority from elected local leaders to unelected bureaucrats in Delhi. Seven years later, and the government’s response to a populace that has been demanding restoration of its democratic rights is to give them more bureaucrats.

The geography of discontent

To understand why the creation of five new districts is insufficient, one must first understand the singular nature of Ladakh as a political and geographical entity. Ladakh is the largest UT in India in terms of area as it is spread across 86,904 sq km along India’s borders with China and Pakistan. Yet, its population is merely 274,000 people according to the 2011 census. It is a land of extreme altitude, frozen passes, and communities separated from each other and from administrative centres by distances that most people would find difficult to imagine.

For decades, this remoteness was the primary lens through which Ladakh’s governance challenges were understood. The argument was simple: People live far from district headquarters and so services do not reach them. It was a reasonable diagnosis, and for a long time, it produced reasonable policy responses: Road construction, digital connectivity, mobile health units. However, somewhere along the way, the government seems to have confused the symptom with the disease. The problem in Ladakh today is not merely that people live far from a district office. The problem is that the people of Ladakh live far from power itself and no amount of re-districting can close that distance.

2019 and its aftermath

When Ladakh became a UT without legislature in 2019, the local population realised that UT status meant they had lost democratic representation and control over their own affairs. Prior to 2019, Ladakh had four elected members to the erstwhile J&K Legislative Assembly. It was imperfect representation in an imperfect system but it was representation nonetheless. It was people who could be voted out, lobbied, pressured, and held to account. Today, Ladakh has no representation.

Its administration is led by a Lieutenant Governor appointed by the Centre, advised by bureaucrats answerable to the Centre, who are implementing policies designed by the Centre. The people of Ladakh did not merely lose representation in 2019. They lost a fundamental democratic right to shape their own lives. The Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils, which had previously served as the primary vehicles for local self-governance, found their powers steadily diminished under direct central rule. Decision-making shifted from elected locals to unelected bureaucrats, creating what observers began calling a representation deficit. Jobs that had previously been accessible through local recruitment channels became entangled in central bureaucratic processes.

Land protection, which were guaranteed under the previous arrangement have been lost. And crucially, the BJP, which had championed UT for Ladakh, had also promised inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution during the 2020 Hill Council elections. That promise has been quietly shelved. Since 2021, the people of Ladakh have been demanding statehood and inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. These are not radical demands. Over 97% of Ladakh’s population belongs to Scheduled Tribes, yet the current governance framework provides no permanent constitutional safeguards against land alienation to outsiders.

These were not street agitations driven by momentary anger. They were organised, sustained, and articulate movements led by two representative bodies: Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance. Together, they represent Ladakh’s religious and political diversity especially the Buddhist and Muslim communities, which have historically been divided on many issues but have found common cause to demand democratic rights. This unity tells us something important: What is at stake in Ladakh is not a communal or partisan grievance; it is a constitutional one. People are not protesting over district boundaries. They are protesting over land, identity, livelihoods, and the right to have an elected representative who is answerableto them.

The protests turned tragic on 24 September, 2025 when four people were killed when demonstrations turned violent in Leh. A shortage of district offices did not cause the violence of September 2025. It was caused by years of accumulated frustration at being governed without being heard. Redistricting does not address that frustration. It does not even acknowledge it. If the government is serious about addressing Ladakh’s grievances—and there is no reason to assume it is not—then the path forward requires more than administrative reorganisation. It requires political courage of a different order.

At minimum, a genuine resolution would involve three things. First, a serious and time-bound engagement is needed on the question of statehood. Ladakh need not immediately become a full state, but a clear roadmap with defined milestones and legislative backing would signal that the demand is being taken seriously rather than being deferred indefinitely. Second, constitutional protections for tribal land and identity, which could be through inclusion under the Sixth Schedule or an equivalent mechanism to provide permanent, justiciable guarantees instead of revocable regulations. And third, the establishment of a Ladakh Public Service Commission, which would give the people of Ladakh genuine control over local recruitment and reduce dependence on central bodies that are indifferent to local knowledge and priorities.

Ladakh is not asking for more offices. It is asking for dignity of self-governance, of constitutional protection, and of democratic participation. It is asking for the kind of political standing that every other region of India, however small, takes for granted. Sikkim is a state with a population of 700,000 people and it has an assembly, a chief minister, a public service commission, and elected representatives who must answer to their voters. Ladakh, with a comparable population and far more complex challenges, has none of these. Making five new districts is meant to decentralise governance, cut travel time, and provide public services more quickly and effectively. For administrative reasons, reorganisation makes sense. However, if distance from governance is the problem, the solution is not to have more district offices but to give Ladakhis a legislature of their own. An elected assembly sitting anywhere in Ladakh would do more for the people of remote areas than a freshly-appointed Deputy Commissioner who reports upward rather than to the people. His loyalty and accountability runs vertically to the central government. The local people have no power to question him, vote him out, or hold him responsible.

By Ummul Huda

Ummul Huda is a Research Scholar at University of Kashmir and is studying Ladakh’s governance systems.

Pal and Zin: A reflection on Bhoti/Ladakhi language

This edition of Stawa was supposed to contain the twelfth episode of the serialised story. Instead, I am writing a reflection on it. Readers, I apologise for the interlude. The episodes of Pal and Zin tale are piecemeal in scope. Nevertheless, this article marks a year-long engagement between Dr Thupstan Norboo, Stawa, and me. Therefore, it felt fitting to relate the story behind its origin and writing about the process so far.

The genesis of the bilingual serialised fiction could be traced back to a conversation between Editor of Stawa, Sunetro Ghosal, and me about Bhoti/Ladakhi/Tibetan language. We discussed many facets of the language, including its dwindling fortune, seeming irrelevance in an increasing mono-cultural and mono-lingual world and blatant policy jinx. The rampant linguistic and cultural purge in Tibet and seemingly benign and yet chronic political apathy in India are only hastening its inevitable extinction. Nevertheless, the hour-long peripatetic exchange brought to the fore the dearth of fiction or literature in Bhoti/Ladakhi language. A jarring gap, we realised, could be addressed at our station instead of lamenting over its dismal situation.

The Tibetan plateau, the linguistic fountainhead of Bhoti language, culturally gave precedence to philosophical undertakings through a concerted royal patronage during historical times and spiritual reverence of the populace, in general—a collective choice that effectively relegated Bhoti literature to a lesser kind. In effect, the corpus of literature in Bhoti is largely philosophical in content with a typical terminology that is technical and specific, firmly embedded into the structural mores of Buddhism. The monolithic set of philosophical vocabulary, thus, serves the purpose of thought well, but not so much when it comes to the evolution of the language.

Akin to any other language, Bhoti is inherently fluid and amorphous incorporating a multitude of human experiences beyond the concerns of a marshalled philosophy. Yet, it lacks a literary platform, in terms of production and consumption, where those experiences could be experimented, exercised and expressed, facilitating a dynamic lexicon accrual in keeping with the changing world. Consequently, in the shared memory of Tibet and contiguous regions abutting the Himalayas, serious written works of fiction in Bhoti is sparse, save a few recent publications from Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, Dharamsala, India and Kham region of Tibet, which emanated during an ephemeral cultural revival period beginning the 1980s, under the vigilant watch of Chinese Communist Party.

Understandably, the existential threat for Bhoti is not peculiar to Ladakh. The larger Tibetan community, in exile or otherwise, is also reeling in its wake. Yet, Bhoti literature, the bedrock for the language, is still a second thought in the social consciousness of its linguistic demography despite its conspicuous absence and the central role it could play in its survival, though, the odds of which is fretting away each passing day. It is in this backdrop ‘Pal and Zin’ was conceived and written. The narrative is addressed to children in the hope of attracting young minds, but more so to keep the complexities of its language, plot and translation to its bare minimum.

As the reader is aware, each episode of the serialised narrative is published in English and Bhoti/Ladakhi, and the latter comes with an appendage of word-meaning section. While a language is multi-faceted with aspects such as syntax, style, voice and so on, this article primarily concerns itself with vocabulary. The idea is to accentuate the nature of language through the admixture of words that Bhoti/Ladakhi acquired over a prolong exposure to a potpourri of cultures, languages and ideas criss-crossing Ladakh. 

Most of Bhoti/Ladakhi language words have their origins in native language drawn from pre-historic Trans Himalayan linguistic roots. Before Thonmi Sambhota codified it in the Seventh Century CE, the Tibet plateau (Zang Zung) spoke the language for centuries. It also acquired words and expressions from foreign languages such as Chinese, Kashmiri, Arabic, and Persian. These indigenised foreign terms are yet to find their place in its lexicon. In this regard, etymological research could prove an effective contribution towards Bhoti/Ladakhi development.

The list of Bhoti/Ladakhi terms discussed so far in the story includes words that are familiar in the written form of the language; some have their secondary or tertiary meanings faded away due to disuse; those which have been forgotten in spoken language altogether and have been replaced by unassimilated loanwords from languages such as Hindi, Urdu and English; colloquial words have firm roots in the written language albeit with pronunciation alterations; those which are purely spoken; and new words that were devised by me using portmanteaus. In fact, many of the names of the characters have been inspired from blends, such as Skardha (a blend of Skar: star and Dha: arrow), Gothgyal (Goth: vulture + Gyal: king) and Dojom (Dud: evil + Jom: subdue), revealing aspects of the characters such as their species, personality, role in the story and so on. Blend words, therefore, play a prominent role in Bhoti language in creative expression, linguistic efficiency and, importantly, in invention of new words. This demonstrates the inherent flexibility and adaptability of Bhoti/Ladakhi language, which is a tool that is enriched and receives a renewed lease of life when we start exploring its potential for expression.

Bhoti was a phonetic language that has increasingly deviated from its original makeup. In its spoken form, the language has various pronunciation schemes prevalent across the Tibetan plateau. As we move eastward from Baltistan to Central Tibet, diglossia becomes pronounced. Even in Ladakh, we have a rainbow of dialects. Some of them still retain the puritan sounds, where some communities pronounce words true to their written forms, as in Kargili/Purgi dialect. In central Ladakh, it begins to metamorphose, while the Changthang region in the east uses a diglossic form of the language. The word-meaning section of Pal and Zin also discusses some words that have undergone different degrees of phonetic transformation. It is pertinent to stress that Bhoti/Ladakhi language needs a phonetic transcription system that could account for such a diverse set of its dialectic variations and would go a long way in unifying the language.

Finally, the role of literature cannot be over emphasised in preserving and promoting a language. It is an open secret that spoken language is learnt through listening, while written through reading. Without either of them, a language is rendered incomplete and destined to die. Think of the prominent languages of the world such as English, French, Chinese, Spanish, Hindi, Urdu, Bengali, Assamese etc.; they all have a rich literary traditions. Literature is a necessary condition, if not a sufficient condition, for a language to flourish. Bhoti/Ladakhi language, therefore, needs a body of serious literature that is drawn on mundane experiences and narratives as it has done extensively with esoteric and analytical realms. I hope, this small experiment with Pal and Zin not only provides a source of entertainment and occasional inspiration, but also initiates a conversation on Bhoti/Ladakhi language and its practices.

By Lhundup Gyalpo

Lhundup Gyalpo is the author of Betty’s Butter Tea – Stories from Ladakh.

Sketch by Tsetan Angmo

Tsetan Angmo is a visual artist, a passionate illustrator and an animator with a flair for bringing characters to life through motion with a keen love for storytelling.

Book review: Refreshing and unsettling

What treasure house exists in this world?

World has a treasury abundant with gold.

But if the radiance of noble gold is unknown,

Then gold and brass are indistinguishable in hue.

‘dzambuling la, Ladakhi song

Most books about Ladakh speak of monasteries, passes, and politics. Ladakh: The Land of Gold does something far more unsettling: It asks whether an entire civilisation can orbit around a metal that barely existed in economic abundance.

The most striking contribution of Samphel’s work is how he successfully deconstructs the ‘ant gold’ myth, moving the conversation far beyond the literal, and often exhausting, search for marmots or ancient insects. Instead, he treats the myth as a grand historical distraction, a ‘golden veil’ that for centuries blinded the outside world to the true geography and social fabric of the Trans Himalayas. By peeling back this veil, Samphel exposes the profound disconnect between the ‘Shangri-la’ fantasies of emperors and explorers and the harsh reality of the actual gold-washers’ lives.

While the world dreamed of a land where gold was dug by ants, the Ser-pa (gold-washers) were enduring a brutal existence, battling freezing glacial melt-water and social marginalisation to extract a mineral that their own culture often viewed as a spiritual violation. This isn’t just a history of a metal; it is a long-overdue humanisation of a landscape that the West has too often treated as a mere fable.

While many non-local scholars have historically eulogised Ladakh as a ‘Himalayan Heaven’, a place of serene contentment where everyone lived in peaceful harmony with ‘enough for all’, Samphel’s research provides a much-needed reality check. He reveals that the ancient situation in Ladakh was far from the idyllic projection often sold to the West; in truth, for many, it was profoundly dikparik (a Ladakhi term for a situation that is pitiable or heart-wrenchingly miserable).

The most powerful evidence of this is the history of gold prospecting itself. While the ‘ant gold’ myth painted a picture of effortless wealth, the actual history of gold digging in Ladakh reflects hardship rather than prosperity. It was not a pursuit of riches, but a desperate struggle for survival. The Ser-pa were not contented citizens in a paradise; they were marginalised individuals performing back-breaking labour in freezing glacial waters for returns that were often negligible.

By documenting this harsh reality, Samphel effectively deconstructs the ‘Shangri-la’ façade. He proves that the ‘Land of Gold’ was actually a landscape of extreme deprivation, where the golden glitter of the riverbeds served to mask the severe, often desperate conditions of those forced to scavenge it. This echoes with the reality we find in the records of Ladakh’s royal ledgers. I remember reading elsewhere that when Zorawar Singh invaded in 1834 and demanded a war indemnity of Rs 50,000, the ‘Kings of the Land of Gold’ were so bankrupt that they had to surrender household tea kettles and personal ornaments to meet the debt. This episode captures the gulf between the legend of abundance and the reality of scarcity, which Samphel describes vividly.

Ultimately, Samphel’s work reveals that the ‘Land of Gold’ was a dangerous hallucination. The myth invited centuries of invaders who expected a treasury but instead found a population struggling for survival and a monarchy that traded its sovereignty for a debt it could not pay. This work is a sobering reminder that behind every ‘heavenly’ projection is a very human, and often very painful, history of endurance. An empire of illusion built on a handful of dust.

Ladakh the land of gold: A history of prospecting in the Trans Himalayas of India by Rigzin Samphel (M/s Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, INR 750, p. 249)

Phuntsog Tsering is an entrepreneur from Leh and manages MIGSAL Woodworks.

By Phuntsog Tsering

Book review: Quietly evocative

Some books are read. Others are felt. Ruler of the sky firmly belongs to the latter category. As one reads, it lingers, unsettles and quietly transforms. Beneath its words one senses the vulnerability, fatigue and a quiet enduring and suffering.

At first, the voice feels deeply personal almost like a confession of someone who has endured much. What strikes one almost immediately while reading the collection of poetry and prose is a peculiar and persistent question: Who is speaking? As one moves further, the boundary starts to dissolve. The ‘I’ no longer feel singular. It expands and shifts and eventually seems to embody something far greater than an individual voice. One begins to sense that it is not merely the author speaking but perhaps nature itself observing, grieving and reflecting through human language. Or perhaps it is the reader.

The book gives an emotional account of the extent of destruction humans have wrecked on nature. It raises an unsettling question: Who is the ultimate sufferer? The answer, it seems is collective. By all the destruction humans have done on Mother Nature for ephemeral gain, humans have invited unending suffering on everyone including themselves.

Pieces like False spring, a phenomenon we have just experienced, echo this reality. The piece September snow talks about the disturbed natural rhythm and draws parallel with a bee colony experiencing collapse and disorder. As nature speaks of suffering and agony from humans, it also reminds us that it is in fact the ruler of the sky. Indifference speaks about what nature can do, and reminds us that it will not hesitate in showing its wrath either. Birds of paradise warn that humans can also go extinct just like unicorns—which it claims were not mythical creatures as humans have been led to believe. The book ends on a rather positive note. There is a quiet, almost surprising sense of hope.

Although the ‘I’ sounds timid, worn, almost faded, there is a quiet strength that cannot be dismissed. Between the lines, it reminds us that unchecked human greed carries consequences not through anger but though calm and inevitable reckoning. This duality of tenderness and quiet authority makes the voice powerful. It reminds us that nature is beautiful, mysterious and occasionally refuses to explain itself.

Like all pieces of poetry and prose, it is sometimes difficult to understand many of the layers of the text but then again this is also true for the weather, mountains and clouds that suddenly decide to disappear just when you need shade. You may not always get it, but you feel it and perhaps that is the point.

The voice may feel like nature: Gentle, vast and quietly powerful. And the deeper you immerse yourself, it begins to speak in ways that feel very personal, almost as intimate as love itself.

My favourite pieces in the book include False spring, Don’t fix me, Be a bee, Friend, and In the end. I would recommend reading this book slowly, and if possible, aloud. Each poem and prose piece carries multiple layers as complex as nature itself. There is no single meaning to the text in this book and it invites personal interpretation and reflection.

Ruler of the Sky: Poetry and Prose by Padma Angmo (Bluerose Publishers P Limited, INR 599)

Dr. Spalchen Gonbo is a Paediatrician based in Ladakh.

By Dr. Spalchen Gonbo

Development with dialogue: Charting Ladakh’s future

Ladakh is undergoing significant administrative and developmental changes within the Union Territory framework with several decisions being made to bring governance closer to the people. Among the most notable steps is the approval for the creation of five new districts: Nubra, Sham, Changthang, Zanskar, and Drass, which takes the total administrative units in Ladakh from two to seven. This move is expected to decentralise governance, improve delivery of services in remote regions, and create fresh opportunities for employment and local entrepreneurship. For a region defined by difficult terrain and scattered populations, such administrative restructuring can play an important role in ensuring that governance is more accessible, responsive, and efficient. 

Beyond the creation of new districts, the broader intent appears to be a strengthening of institutional mechanisms to support Ladakh’s long term development. Improved connectivity, better access to welfare schemes, and more localised decision making are expected outcomes of decentralisation. In Ladakh, where distance and geography often shape access to opportunity, such steps can have a meaningful impact on everyday life. 

In addition, there are continued efforts at political engagement. Union Home Minister, Amit Shah is scheduled to reach Ladakh on 30 April for a two-day visit. He is expected to participate in key engagements and interact with various stakeholders. Such visits along with scheduled interactions between government representatives and local stakeholders reflect an attempt to address the region’s aspirations through dialogues. These engagements serve as platforms for the government and local stakeholders to articulate concerns, expectations, and pathways forward. 

In this regard, certain issues voiced by civil society groups and local representatives remain central to this discourse. This includes demands related to statehood and inclusion under the Sixth Schedule, which are seen by some groups as mechanisms to ensure greater political representation and protection of local identity and land rights. Environmental concerns have also been a part of the conversation given Ladakh’s fragile ecosystem and the negative impacts of rapid development. 

Furthermore, the events of 24 September, 2025 in Leh, when protests escalated into violence and resulted in injuries, loss of life, and damage to property, continue to cast a shadow on current dialogues. Different stakeholders provide varying interpretations of what transpired. Civil society groups have called for withdrawal of cases against protestors, compensation for affected families, and more immediate and visible political engagement. These demands reflect underlying concerns about justice, accountability, and trust. 

In response, institutional processes have been set in motion. A judicial inquiry has been commissioned to examine the events in detail. Legal proceedings continue, and many of those who were detained have been granted bail. Such steps highlight the role of formal mechanisms to address complex and sensitive situations, while also providing space for grievances to be examined in a structured manner. 

Another area of discussion has been the format and pace of dialogues between stakeholders and the government. Civil society groups have demanded more immediate engagement at the highest levels, while the government has adopted phased consultations through designated committees and institutional forums. This approach seeks to balance the need for timely responses with the importance of detailed deliberation and consensus building. It also reflects the challenges of addressing multiple demands in a region with diverse perspectives. 

The broader challenge for Ladakh lies in aligning multiple priorities such as development, representation, environmental sustainability, and cultural preservation within a framework that ensures stability and inclusivity. The region’s strategic location adds another layer of importance, making it essential that governance and development are handled with sensitivity and foresight. Efforts to improve infrastructure, tourism, and economic opportunities must therefore be accompanied by measures that safeguard Ladakh’s unique heritage and ecological balance. Ultimately, Ladakh’s future will depend on sustained cooperation between the administration and civil society. Development initiatives such as new districts, infrastructure expansion, and improved governance frameworks can bring tangible benefits, but their long term success will depend on trust, participation, and continued dialogue. A balanced approach that combines administrative reform with responsive and inclusive engagement offers the most promising path forward.

Rishi Suri is Senior Editor of The Daily Milap.

By Rishi Suri

(Image: Minister for Home Affairs, Government of India Amit Shah arriving in Leh on 30 April, 2026. Photography courtesy: PTI).

Changthang district: India’s quiet assertion on the LAC

On 27 April, 2026, The Ladakh Gazette (SG-LD-E-27042026-1712) carried a seemingly routine four-page notification. However, it was anything but routine. Under the Jammu and Kashmir Land Revenue Act, the Union Territory of Ladakh created five new districts: Sham, Nubra, Changthang, Zanskar, and Drass. To the untrained eye, this was administrative housekeeping. To those who follow the slow, often opaque contest along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), it marked a calculated step in statecraft.

This was not merely redrawing of administrative boundaries. It was India institutionalising its frontier. At the centre of this move lies Changthang District, headquartered at Nyoma. By formally enumerating 24 revenue villages including forward locations such as Nyoma, Chushul, Koyul, Damjok, and Anlay, the notification converts ambiguity into administrative fact.

A territory that exists only as a patrol zone is prone to contestation. A territory that exists in revenue records, with defined jurisdiction, administrative oversight, and civilian presence, is much harder to question. In strategic terms, this is a shift from claimed space to governed space.

It also marks a shift from episodic patrol presence to institutionalised governance embedded in the terrain itself. With Nyoma serving as the district headquarter and a high altitude airbase, civilian administration and military capability are now closely aligned. The result is not just presence, but continuity of control. However, administrative consolidation alone is insufficient unless it is also anchored with durable human presence, which in frontier geographies ultimately depends on viable local economies embedded within ecological limits.

Furthermore, in frontier statecraft, even names carry strategic weight. The notification adopts local phonetic renderings common in revenue records. For instance, ‘Damjok’ for the Demchok sector, ‘Anlay’ for Hanle, ‘Kungaym’ for Kungyam, ‘Kariy’ for Kerey, and ‘Hemya’ for Himya. These variations arise because historical revenue records in Ladakh were not maintained in the Tibetan script or Changthang dialects. They primarily used Urdu and were often documented by officials from outside the region. This created inherent limitations in capturing the precise phonetic and tonal nuance of Tibetic languages spoken on the plateau. Subsequent transliteration into English further distorted original sounds.

While these renderings reflect an attempt to integrate remote Changpa settlements into formal administration, they also underscore the urgent need for toponymic standardisation. In contested regions along the LAC, where nomenclature itself can acquire strategic utility, consistency across revenue records, Survey of India maps, military documentation, and historical cartography is essential. Precision in naming, grounded in authentic local phonetics, is not cosmetic. It is foundational to durable sovereignty.

The deeper challenge, however, is demographic. The Changpa nomads have long sustained human presence across this harsh plateau. Yet younger generations are drifting away to Leh and other urban centres, drawn by education, income, and stability. If this out-migration accelerates, India risks a paradoxical situation with stronger administrative structures but thinner human presence on the ground; a gap with direct strategic implications.

The answer lies in making Changthang economically viable for its own people. The pashmina economy must evolve from raw wool extraction into a value-added ecosystem encompassing design, branding, processing, and global marketing anchored locally.

A promising livelihood model lies in value-added yak dairy production, particularly hard and soft yak cheese (locally Churpey). Nepal’s highland communities have already demonstrated how the same product can be transformed into a global export success, marketed as ‘Himalayan Dog Chews’ and ‘Bone Candy’, which sustain pastoral economies at scale.

Ladakh has begun to show similar potential. Thenlay Nurboo of Nordic Farm, Durbuk, recently won a Gold Medal at the Mundial do Queijo do Brasil 2026 for his Yak Churpey (soft). With proper scaling, quality certification, and locally-anchored processing and branding that preserves authentic nomenclature, Churpey-based products, whether for gourmet consumption, wellness markets, or premium pet nutrition, can become a high-margin export ecosystem. More importantly, they can generate stable income to anchor habitation in this frontier region.

Complementing this, the cultivation of high-value Sowa Rigpa medicinal plants such as Resilient Stonecrop (Rhodiola imbricata), Ephedra (Ephedra gerardiana), and Pink Arnebia (Arnebia euchroma), species adapted to the plateau’s extreme ecology, offers a parallel livelihood pathway. Supported by institutions such as the National Institute of Sowa Rigpa, these plants can be integrated into nutraceuticals and traditional formulations, creating culturally resonant income streams while reducing pressure on wild populations.

Similarly, Changthang’s geothermal assets, particularly the hot springs at Chumathang, Demchok, and Puga valley, the latter representing India’s most significant geothermal energy prospect in the region, extends this logic further. Alongside their therapeutic role, they open a long-term pathway toward high altitude energy experimentation and sustainability. Integrated with efforts to conserve dark sky through the creation of Hanle Dark Sky Reserve can evolve into a rare convergence of ecology, energy, and astronomy-linked tourism.

Equally critical is how development is structured. While Changthang’s solar potential is widely recognised as a strategic asset, large-scale installations can disrupt fragile grazing ecosystems by altering solar radiation, soil moisture patterns, and wind flow to change microclimates. Elevated solar infrastructure is not ecologically neutral and should not be assumed as a viable model for pastoral landscapes. Evidence from similar cold steppe and desert systems, including the Mongolian plateau, suggests that fixed arrays can impose long-term constraints on the nomadic pastoralism practiced by the Changpas.

A more cautious pathway would be to carefully explore site-specific, grazing-sensitive agrivoltaic designs. These would require high clearance structures, wide spatial spacing, and clearly defined migration corridors, supported by genuine community-led pasture mapping, co-management frameworks, and multi-year ecological monitoring to determine its continued viability. Energy security and livelihood security must therefore be treated as co-dependent objectives, not competing imperatives.

The elevation of Nyoma is deliberate, not incidental. A remote administrative unit is now positioned as a forward node where governance, logistics, and air power converge. This reflects a longer-term effort to consolidate presence. Through Changthang district, India is signalling a shift from guarding borders to structuring them.

The notification is only the first step. Its success will depend on execution, including clean revenue records, systematic toponymic harmonisation rooted in local phonetics, economic anchoring of local communities, and ecologically-informed development. India has drawn the lines. The real test lies in sustaining them through consistent governance, presence, administration, and continuity. In the high altitude expanses of Changthang, sovereignty will not rest on declarations alone. It will depend on whether governance takes root and endures. The map has been written. The task now is to ensure it holds.

By Phuntsog Tsering

Phuntsog Tsering is former Deputy Advisor, Ministry of Defence, Government of India.